Cruisers Net publishes Loose Cannon articles with Captain Swanson’s permission in hopes that mariners with saltwater in their veins will subscribe. $7 per month or $56 for the year; you may cancel at any time.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When all else fails, try journalism. Get Ready for a Rougher Ride in the Bahamas This WinterEl Niño Diminishes Hurricane Risk But Promotes ‘Northers’
Rob Lightbown founded Crown Weather Services in 1994 to provide personalized weather forecasting and has tracked tropical storms and hurricanes for customers ever since. On Thursday, NOAA announced that the El Niño weather phenomenon had formed in the tropical Pacific Ocean. A very strong El Niño is going to disrupt the atmosphere for the next several months. This weather phenomenon will shape winter conditions across the Bahamas, likely making cruising there a somewhat more stressful undertaking. Foreign sailors may find themselves more likely to have to alter plans because of severe weather than during previous visits. Yes, El Niño winters can be particularly harsh across the Bahamas. This is due to the development of a particularly strong sub-tropical jet stream that often leads to a very active storm track that moves near or just north of the Northern Bahamas. This active storm track during winter months leads to frequent bouts of significant severe weather, heavy rain and frequent squalls across the Central and Northern Bahamas. El Niño winters are wet, cool and very stormy across the central and northern Bahamas. For the Southern Bahamas and Turks & Caicos, bouts of gusty winds with swells will occur during the winter as strong fronts pass by just to the north.
All of this will lead to frequent unfavorable conditions for cruising across much of the Bahamas due to frequent frontal passages and an overall stormy winter. Cruisers may be need to find protective shelter from the weather for longer than usual—sometimes for several days at a time. Competition among cruisers will likely be strong for those spots with all-around protection from clocking winds. What Is El Niño?El Niño is a global phenomenon that’s centered in the central and eastern Pacific when the ocean water temperatures become much warmer than average. This phenomenon oftentimes leads to a large disruption to the weather patterns across the globe. The El Niño that we are currently moving in is expected to be one of, if not the strongest on record. El Niño conditions usually peak in the late fall and winter months. I want to point out that the previous strongest El Niños on record were in 1997 and 1982, and I do think that we will surpass both of those in terms of the amount of heat that’ll be present in the eastern and central Pacific. What About the 2026 Hurricane Season?The rapid transition into El Niño conditions is likely to lead to much lower-than-average activity in the Atlantic Basin this hurricane season. The abnormally warm waters in the tropical eastern Pacific during a strong El Niño will increase the amount of wind shear over the Caribbean and the tropical Atlantic. High degrees of windshear can lead to tropical systems that are unable to organize and develop into tropical storms and hurricanes across the Atlantic. Back in late March, I issued our annual hurricane season forecast, in which I forecasted 11 named storms, five of those storms becoming hurricanes and two of those hurricanes becoming major hurricanes due to the expectation of strong El Niño conditions. I still think that this forecast is still valid due to the expectation of the strong El Niño conditions. While it is expected to be “quiet” in terms of the number of storms, it does not mean that there won’t be a impactful tropical storm or hurricane this season. In fact, a number of the past strong El Niño years did bear a impactful tropical storm or hurricane. They include 1957’s Hurricane Audrey, 1965’s Hurricane Betsy, 1997’s Hurricane Danny and 2015’s Hurricane Joaquin. There are a few areas of concern this hurricane season that we should be aware of. While the strong El Niño conditions will probably shut down hurricanes in the Caribbean and the tropical Atlantic, it can lead to lower than average wind shear conditions north of 20 North Latitude. Because of this, it’s possible that any tropical storms or hurricanes will either curve towards the Bahamaa, the East Coast of the United States and Atlantic Canada or be directed north and northeastward near Bermuda. Another area that I have some concerns with in terms of possible impacts from any tropical storms or hurricanes will be along the U.S. Gulf Coast and especially the central and eastern Gulf Coast from Louisiana to Florida. The reason why I think this is that I can foresee a scenario in which any westward traveling tropical disturbances moving through the Caribbean wait to develop until they reach the Southern and Central Gulf. Across the rest of the U.S. South—as in the Bahamas—El Nino winters are very often stormy. We can expect a pattern in which winter weather extends quite far into the the south, including heavy rain and frequent squalls. Ice and snowy conditions could happen as far south as the Gulf coast. LOOSE CANNON covers hard news, technical issues and nautical history. Every so often he tries to be funny. Subscribe for free to support the work. If you’ve been reading for a while—and you like it—consider upgrading to paid. |
Cruisers Net publishes Loose Cannon articles with Captain Swanson’s permission in hopes that mariners with saltwater in their veins will subscribe. $7 per month or $56 for the year; you may cancel at any time.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When all else fails, try journalism. Sharked! The Emasculation of America’s Predator ClassRugged Individuals Pin Hopes on a Government CommitteeFlorida fishermen are frustrated. Despite deploying hundreds of thousands of dollars in motors, molded fiberglass, fuel, rods, reels and YETI coolers, this benighted cohort is being outwitted by creatures with brains the size of a walnut. Sharks are eating their lunch…literally. Dinner, too. Pretty soon these brash bulls will be (flirting with) their wives. How it happens: Having hooked a fish, the angler begins the process of reeling in his catch. He is fighting the fish, and the fish is fighting back. The line is taut. Then, suddenly it’s not. Reeling becomes easy-peasy, and the reason why is that a shark has bitten off as much of the aft portion of the fish as it could. Tailess, the fish has lost its purchase, and, besides, it’s dead. This is not a new phenomenon. What is new: The frequency. Sharks are back, baybee! They’re practicing a little angler predation in the morning, then nipping New Smyrna Beach-goers in the afternoon. Even President Trump has noticed.¹ This state of affairs has caused great sadness among fishermen. The collective gnashing of teeth was evident on Facebook. These poor guys are hurting. “Yeah, nothing like blowing $500 in fuel catching a shitload of fish and losing them to sharks. Definitely sucks,” Philip Punch wrote. “Absolutely the worst,” Thomas Botwinski lamented. “I lost six consecutive nice yellowtail hookups last trip.” “This is the worse it has ever been in 50 years of fishing. EVERYWHERE, the sharks are trained now to run to boats for an easy meal, and, to the point, it’s impossible to fish,” sniffled Bob Hubbard.
The cull-the-herd proponents want to eliminate the problem by either “harvesting” the offenders and grilling the steaks out of them or via 12-gauge deer slugs. (Alas, they complain, sandbar sharks are a federally protected species.) Here’s some pertinent scientific-sounding talk:
Yeah, I don’t think anyone has proven that a bullshark needs the presence of a boat to find his next meal, but here, enjoy some more science gobbledegook, this time sneering at the highly unadaptable “fishers” (not fishermen, not anymore), whose identities are being threatened:
Enter U.S. Senator Rick Scott of Florida, who has been compared to Voldermort for both his looks and larcenous bent. In July 2025, he and Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii introduced the SHARKED Act, which would establish a task force to solve the depradation problem. The bill has passed the House and now awaits a final floor vote in the U.S. Senate. The bill’s announcement noted the fisherman frustration, federal regulators’ lack of empathy and a most sincere concern about the possible harm that could come to the feasting shark population. Quoth the press release (emphasis added):
Maybe, the fisheries management community is unsympathetic because overall shark populations continue to be way down from historical norms, and even though there may be a comeback in places such as Florida, it’s only a partial comeback. Plus, complaining about sharks doing shark things is a bit like calling the police because some goshdarn woodpecker won’t let you sleep late on Sunday morning. Meanwhile, the fish-killing crowd is lashing out. It’s directing its frustration against the ecotourism activity of “shark diving,” another somewhat silly passtime (think bungee-jumping) that supports it’s own little Florida industry. Two Florida congressmen introduced the Florida Safe Seas Act, which is also pending in the Senate. This legislation would outlaw feeding sharks in federal waters off Florida, feeding being a necessary precursor to attracting sharks to a central location where they can be observed by divers paying $250 each for the experience. Florida has already outlawed the practice in state waters. Again, the theory (which is treated as fact) is that chumming for Jaws by a handful of small operators is somehow teaching these beasts to associate boats with food on a species-wide level. This too is just one more big maybe. The only real hope is that the Task Force might come up with some tech solution that allows boaters to somehow jam a shark’s onboard fish-detection sensors. Either that, or maybe we just fall back on the solution du jour for a whole host of today’s thorny issues—drones. There must be a way to use drones here, no? Otherwise, maybe we do nothing. After all, we are talking about an expensive hobby, not some existential threat. You can keep fishing on nature’s terms or take up golf. (Your wife isn’t really hooking up with Bill the Bull, is she?) What was it that one unsympathetic commenter said, responding to that Facebook conversation about shark predation? “Unless you have grown gills and fins, you’re the problem not the sharks. Almost no one gets attacked by a shark sitting in the bar or at the mall, and I’ve never had one steal fish from me at Publix,” Tony Spagna said. LOOSE CANNON covers hard news, technical issues and nautical history. Every so often he tries to be funny. Subscribe for free to support the work. If you’ve been reading for a while—and you like it—consider upgrading to paid. |
The sunrise was perfect this morning as I reflected on two years of my life. Big news this week, my friends. Thanks very much for being aboard! ~J If you just dove into our very engaging little community, please read SPARS & SPARRING, .….it introduces my wonders and my wanders. & THANK YOU! After 23 months of both rebuilding STEADFAST beyond her former solid glory (a vast undertaking including new Purpleheart stem and knee, 32 repurposed old growth long leaf yellow pine planks and so, so much more) and refinishing her interior to an interesting, intricate, efficient, refreshed place to live, she was launched, with no issues, Monday, June 15th. The relief was palpable, a weight lifted. Our submersion went without a glitch, drip, leak, problem or falter.
October 2024, destruction not yet complete, & now. Here’s 42 tons dropping in. Jimmy (legs left) & Andrew took great care. Hearts soared, breathing calmed, sleep came easy with the gentle rocking motion of the ocean. The next morning, her 1979 Detroit 4-71 Diesel engine fired to life on the first try, relieving us further; the 4-meter drive shaft took a few hours to get aligned <5/1000, but the Sailor got it done. He is, and I told him so, one determined, um, man. I don’t think that’s exactly the way I phrased it and I mean that in the most endearing way possible. Electronic Navigation systems came to life, depth sounder indicated, generator fired up, pumps ran, lights lit, refrigeration stayed cold, anemometer told us the wind. We completed near-impossible tasks; don’t be surprised if I look a tad tired. LIFE IS GOOD.We planned to depart at dawn on Thursday but COULD NOT STAY ANOTHER DAY— and pulled out of the haul slip before sunset Wednesday, provisions not even unpacked, motored a bit and dropped anchor, for its very first time, in a broad lee-shore cove. That new 155# (70kg) Mantus shot off her new bronze bow roller like a reassuring rocket, sank palpably in the Chesapeake Bay mud, and I slept the sleep of someone who has FINALLY accomplished a task that has been on their plate for longer than they ever imagined it could be. The two half-inch thick channels and new anchor system are a secure addition to the vessel, even though we modified William Hand, Jr’s original design. During the first three years, STEADFAST, with her great mass and Mother Nature’s remarkable will, wind and tides, developed an ability to drag anchor at the most inopportune times. One of those drags was dramatic enough to be published in SAIL magazine in 2024, experienced and written by yours truly. In the coming weeks we will add a hefty bronze bobstay with plate from the new platform to the original bronze striker above the waterline for increased strength and stability. Thursday’s dawn was damp, ominous. Powerful SSW winds kicked up just over 32mph, creating swells to five feet as we traveled the 48-mile, 300-degree loop that took us on our salty virgin passage. Most of my skills came back fairly firmly, and, two hours ahead of schedule, we were secured to the dock of the Antique & Classic Boat Society’s Annual Show. Lots of learning happens here so if you’re anywhere near St. Michael’s, Maryland and have an interest in preserving history, pop over today, (June 21st 10-3EST). I cannot imagine or remember when I last won a blue ribbon, and this one is coveted. STEADFAST was unaware of this particular prize, which made it all the more delightful. I think we all have a spark of competitive nature; I did a ‘lil fist pump when the bespectacled, charming Judge Nicolas (aged 9) presented me with this. His discerning fellow Junior Sailors here at the Antique & Classic Wooden Boat Show determined, with clear, undisputed great taste, that STEADFAST was Best In Show, earning 5-star ratings from all involved. We are so happy to be AFLOAT that this endearing, unanticipated little bonus brought wider smiles, which I wasn’t sure was even possible. Her crew had already prevailed in a lengthy SPAR with Mother Nature. There is a cool, dry breeze blowing, and we’ll have bright sunshine on the longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. Until next week, I’ll be grinning, and I hope you are, too, whatever life brings. ~J If you think someone else might like to follow along, especially now that we’re YACHTING STEADFAST again, please simply hit the re-stack circular arrows or forward this email. My writing content is free to all; paid subscribers put diesel in the tanks. I look at that like a bonus in case we don’t have any wind; I’ve learned to truly appreciate both. So grateful to you for staying aboard! ~J Share SPARRING WITH MOTHER NATURE REFERENCES: https://sailmagazine.com/ FOR MORE ON THE REBUILD: & SEARCH THE ARCHIVES—23 MONTHS WORTH!
© 2026 Janice Anne Wheeler |
Cruisers Net publishes Loose Cannon articles with Captain Swanson’s permission in hopes that mariners with saltwater in their veins will subscribe. $7 per month or $56 for the year; you may cancel at any time.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When all else fails, try journalism. Warship Incident: British Cruisers Screwed Up, Russians Not So MuchRetired U.S. Navy Destroyer Skipper Evaluates the Warning-Shot Scenario
The author is a retired U.S. naval officer whose service included command of the destroyer USS Spruance. Westbrook now teaches navigation to cruisers at Trawler Academy in the Chesapeake Bay region. (For context: The June 16 incident came after British forces had boarded Smyrtos, a sanctioned Russian shadow fleet tanker, in the English Channel on Sunday.) First, let’s discuss the challenge of any warship maneuvering in the vicinity of civilian vessels. I have encountered thousands of situations of egregious violations of the rules of the road by hapless amateur yahoos that regularly their vessels at risk. However, though warning shots are a legal option, they are so far down the list of available options to a ship’s crew that I would never consider using them. And I would add to that thousands of examples of me and my crew trying in vain to raise recreational vessels on channel 13 VHF, and then on Channel 16. Sadly, too many immature mariners either don’t keep their radio tuned to the required channels 13 and 16, or do not know enough about squelch to properly set up their radio to receive a signal. Given the recent tensions between Russia and the United Kingdom, any prudent mariner would avoid steaming near any warship in that vicinity. Russian naval vessels are very distinct in their extremely dark shade of gray paint, so easily recognizable. It is also very likely that there would have been at least one Royal Navy or ship in the vicinity, as I found several articles that referenced the range of separation between the sailboat and the Russian destroyer with precision. I also found at least one reference that stated that the Russian ship was doing drift operations. That is common to save fuel. However, on that mental checklist of options available to any ship’s captain in this situation, starting the main engines and maneuvering away from the sailboat would occur much higher on the list than firing warning shots. I choose to reference the BBC reporting to give us the perspective of the sailing couple, and that includes a few examples of poor seamanship that likely contributed to this situation. The BBC quotes the sailboaters as stating that they changed course by “two degrees” would legally expected that tiny course change to ease the concerns of the Admiral Grigorovich crew. The stated Russian position is that the risk of collision existed, so the two-degree course change was a violation of rule eight which requires maneuvers to be done early and a significant enough course or speed change to be obvious to the other vessel. Two degrees does not meet that requirement. That said, the obligation to maneuver to avoid collision remained with the Russian destroyer. They were operating well offshore, not in restricted waters or in a channel, and the warship clearly a power driven vessel that is obligated to keep clear of the sailboat Actually, I retract my previous assessment about the drifting operations, because the only place that I can find that mentioned is attributed to UK ministry of defense assessment of the situation. (Editor’s note: Westbrook was dictating this story while waiting for the doors to close on a commercial aircraft that was about to take off.) The allegation of drifting operations is really irrelevant. Whether they have their main engines online or not, they were underway in accordance with the COLREG rules of the road. I have operated often in the vicinity of Russian warships. Though certainly not as capable a Navy as the United States Navy or our NATO allies, they are still professional Mariners and have always behaved rationally in every encounter I have had with them, and all of their officers speak excellent English and communicate effectively on the radio.
Given the current situation of ongoing tensions between Russia and the United Kingdom, I expect their overall tone on board the Admiral Grigorovich was to avoid any encounters with merchant ships or recreational vessels. They exercised all legal options are available to them to get the attention of a vessel that by all reports, including the interview by the BBC, was too close to a warship (or any ship) at sea: 500 yards or less. The U.K. Ministry of Defense statement was that the use of warning shots was reckless. Maybe so, and I would not have chosen this if I were standing on the bridge of my destroyer back in the day. But equally reckless is a couple under sail not monitoring the VHF radio as is required by law, and upon hearing the five-short blasts on the ship’s whistle not immediately initiating communications with the ship. Jane Kelvey stated that her sailboat “definitely was not on a collision course.” The fact that she admits being within 500 yards, never answered the radio, and incorrectly believed that a two-degree course change is sufficient if risk of collision exists makes me question her ability to determine whether risk of collision exists. Finally, it is prudent to review with your readers, the concept of “naval vessel protection zone” in the United States around warships. Authorities, prohibitions, and actions available are clearly defined in a radius of 100 yards and 500 yards around these vessels at all times. Nearly all other nations with navies and Coast Guards have similar rules and regulations I am confident the Russians were on the radio trying to hail them, and do not accept Jane Kelvey’s claim to the contrary. I also accept Russian statements that they fired flares to draw attention of the sailboat. I have fired flares in similar situations from my ships over the years, but in daytime they are difficult to see, and therefore not particularly effective. And, as a modification of my previous statement about warning, shots being very low on my personal list, that applies in open ocean waters like this situation. So edit my previous input accordingly. I will add the caveat that on two occasions when I was the executive officer USS Laboon (DDG 58) based in Norfolk, Virginia. We used the 12-gauge noise making rounds to get the attention of recreational Boats maneuvering near us in the Elizabeth River who were violating the naval vessel protection zone. After those two incidents, I established a policy of always having at least one of the ships RHIB Boats in the water at all times when we were maneuvering in the Norfolk Harbor area. That allowed the boat to intercept and escort in a recreational voters who were approaching the NVPZ. Deploying the small boat from a warship in an open ocean transit is rarely an option due to sea state. I just reread the BBC article and noticed its description of “foggy conditions.” Now, I am even more frustrated with the sailboat—sailing in conditions of restricted visibility means their watchstanding vigilance should have been heightened, which brings me right back to the requirement to maintain a watch on VHF Channel 16 for international hailing. This also makes me more doubtful of the U.K. MoD assessment that the Admiral Gregorovitch was drifting—very unlikely in conditions of restricted visibility. Even if the Russians were trying to conserve fuel, Rule 19 requires vessels operating in for near conditions of restricted visibility to keep their engines ready for immediate maneuver. The interview also references the word “rifles,” so that suggests that the destroyer did not fire its main battery gun, but instead a couple of sailors on deck, firing blank rifle rounds, or a similar noisemaking shotgun round like the U.S. Navy has available. Bottom line: Nothing reckless about this incident. The cautionary lesson for your readers is to ensure an understanding of the NVPZ in effect in U.S. Waters and an equivalent in effect and nearly every other countries territorial sea and international waters when you encounter a warship. Expect even greater aggressive defense of these vessels if they are nuclear powered. The NVPZ is for the safety of the warship and for the public safety, since from my perspective of standing watch on a destroyer or cruiser, any vessel that penetrates the NVPZ, doesn’t respond to my radio hails, and ignores the whistles, flares and the warning shots is also beginning to march quickly down a different checklist we use: The one used for determining hostile intent. At the end of that checklist is the use of deadly force for ship self defense, which ANY warship retains regardless of location. LOOSE CANNON covers hard news, technical issues and nautical history. Subscribe for free to support the work. If you’ve been reading for a while—and you like it—consider upgrading to paid. |
Keep your calendar clear: Every season in Washington, NC brings something new and exciting. Enjoy local festivals, area concerts, or waterfront adventure.
Click here for the complete calendar: https://visitwashingtonnc.com/events/#/
Cruisers’ Net Newsletter for this week has just been emailed via Constant Contact.
If you want to view the newsletter but are not signed up to receive them automatically, you can view it at https://conta.cc/4eS3jG7 or see it below.
To automatically receive our emailed Fri Weekly Newsletter and Wed Fuel Report, click:
BoatUS is the leading advocate for boating safety in the US and A CRUISERS NET SPONSOR.
BoatUS Foundation Offers Temporary 90-Day Florida Boating Safety Course in Spanish
| ||||||||
The City of Gulfport and Gulfport Municipal Marina, A CRUISERS NET SPONSOR, always has a full calendar of events for all ages. The marina and harbor, found on the northern shores of Boca Ciega Bay, are easily accessible from the Western Florida ICW, just north of Tampa Bay.
|
…
Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of Gulfport Municipal Marina
Click Here To Open A Chart View Window Zoomed To the Location of Gulfport Anchorage/Mooring Field
Be the first to comment!