Visit Logged
  • Select Region
    • All Regions
    • VA to NC Line
    • North Carolina
    • South Carolina
    • Georgia
    • Eastern Florida
    • Western Florida
    • Florida Keys
    • Okeechobee Waterway
    • Northern Gulf
    • Bahamas
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Washington
    • Puerto Rico
    • Minnesota
    • Maryland
    • Tennessee
    Order by:
    • Cruisers Net Unites with United States Power Squadrons (USPS) / America’s Boating Club

      Cruisers Net unites with United States Power Squadrons (USPS) / America’s Boating Club to help maintain and enhance the accuracy of the Cruisers Net marina listings.

      USPS members will regularly survey marinas to provide timely updated data for our current marinas as well as expand our marina listings. All USPS surveys will be based on on-site visits and personal interviews with the marina staff. The surveys will go through an extensive verification and validation process by USPS and Cruisers Net staff before being entered into the Cruisers Net database.

      The first group of marina surveys has already been incorporated into Cruisers Net database and ranges from St. Augustine City Marina in St. Augustine, FL to Myrtle Beach Yacht Club in Myrtle Beach, SC. Updated information from additional marinas will be incorporated on a regular basis as they are surveyed.

      Cruisers Net fuel editor, Kaye Adams, will still phone survey all marinas for their latest fuel prices and availability status each week. This process ensures Cruisers Net has the most accurate and up-to-date fuel information of any resource.

      The United States Power Squadrons DBA America’s Boating Club, is a non-profit educational organization, founded in 1914, whose mission is to improve maritime safety and enjoyability through classes in seamanship, navigation, and other related subjects.

      Visit https://www.americasboatingclub.org to learn more about United States Power Squadrons (USPS) / America’s Boating Club

      Be the first to comment!

    • USCG Reminder of Proper Seamanship near Dredge and Construction Equipment

      Good reminders of our responsibilities when navigating in the vicinity of dredge or construction equipment.

       

      DREDGING AND MARINE CONSTRUCTION CAUTIONS
      Mariners are cautioned to stay clear of dredge, booster, floating (pontoon) and submerged pipelines, barges, derricks and operating wires associated with dredging and marine construction operations. Operators of vessels of all types should be aware that dredges and floating pipelines are held in place by cables, attached to anchors some distance away from the equipment. Buoys are attached to the anchors so that the anchors may be moved as the dredge advances and the location of the submerged pipelines are marked by buoys on each side of the channel. Mariners are cautioned to strictly comply with the Inland Rules of the Road when approaching, passing and leaving the area of operations, and remain a safe distance away from the dredge, booster, buoys, cables, pipeline, barges, derricks, wires and related equipment. Dredging projects are usually conducted 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All fishnets, crab pots and structures in the general area must be removed prior to commencement of any work. A NO WAKE transit is
      requested of all vessels passing the dredge and if necessary to clarify a SAFE PASSAGE contact the dredge on the appropriate VHF-FM channels.  LNM 42/20

      Be the first to comment!

    • Georgia Legislator Responds to Anchoring Restrictions

      Since the release of GA DNR maps displaying restricted areas of anchorage, James H. Newsome and Ted Arisaka have pursued clarification on the implementation of the broad restrictions. Cruisers Net applauds James and Ted for their efforts on behalf of boaters’ rights. Well done gentlemen!
       
      Georgia Rep Ron Stephens contacted James H. Newsome (as a representation of the boating coalition group) this afternoon and stated that he and the Commissioner have talked about our concerns with the maps showing the overbearing shellfish lease areas, and that DNR will make an internal rule change to address the problems we have pointed out. 
      DNR and Rep. Stephens will introduce legislative changes in the next session of the General Assembly to permanently correct the problem. 
      No timeline was given on how long the rule change  will take. James asked if the map could be removed while we await the revised rules. Rep. Stephens contacted the Commissioner and was told that the map must stay up for now, but there will be no enforcement of anchoring violations in these areas. We assume this to mean  other than the setbacks as defined in HB833 (150′ private docks, 300′ commercial marinas, & 500′ shellfish harvesting areas). 
      While this is welcome relief for boaters and cruisers, and we are hopeful for a quick rule change and resolution to this problem, we must also caution boaters that they should obey the directive of any local DNR Law Enforcement officer if approached while anchoring in one of these areas as defined by the map on DNR’s website. 
      We have seen instances in the past where information about recent directives has not trickled down to the local level. If necessary, read this information to the officer, but follow his/her instructions. And then please contact Ted Arisaka, Kim Russo, or James H. Newsome afterwards. We will forward your information to our contacts at Georgia DNR.

      2 Facebook Likes, 2 Facebook Reactions

      Comments from Cruisers (1)

      1. James H Newsome -  October 17, 2020 - 6:55 am

        Thanks much Larry for your support. I tried to be careful about the wording of my statement. The last thing I want to do is tell boaters that they should knowingly break the boating law pertaining to anchoring. However, based on my conversation with Rep Stephens, who was speaking with the DNR Commissioner Mark Williams, I was told that DNR has no intentions of enforcing anchoring restrictions in the newly announced commercial shellfish leased areas at this time.

        I intend to anchor as usual, avoid anchoring near private docks and marinas, and avoid anchoring near any marked recreational and commercial shellfish areas. The legal setbacks from these areas are: 150' private docks, 300' marinas, and 500' shellfish beds. If I am approached by a GA DNR law enforcement officer, I will politely comply with their directive whether I believe they are right or wrong.

        GA has very few DNR law enforcement officers working the coastal area. They do not have time, nor the inclination to harass boaters. We have been told repeatedly that enforcement is complaint driven. For example, if a marina or private landowner calls DNR and complains about a boat they believe is anchored to close to their dock, then a DNR enforcement officer will be dispatched. He/she will evaluate the situation and instruct the boater and homeowner appropriately. If there is a violation, the boater will be warned and asked to move. Take a screen shot of your GPS position for reference.

        Use common sense, be courteous, and enjoy our beautiful coastal waters. Hopefully someday GA will get the public relations effort right.

        Reply to James
    • Georgia HB 833 and Expanded Shellfish Areas – Update

      Cruisers Net has joined other concerned boating groups in requesting clarification on anchoring restrictions as defined in GA DNR’s Liveaboard Anchoring Illustrative Map. Our thanks to Ted Arisaka and James Newsome for their research and diligence in seeking fairness for all boaters, locals and transients. To see the various layers with defined restrictions, click on Layers in the center of the bottom of the map linked above.

       

      Commissioner Mark Williams,                                                                                          October 12, 2020

      On behalf of the group of boaters who worked with the GA DNR to create replacement HB 833 earlier this year, we seek some clarification on its implementation.  You may recall that during our conference call, we stated our concerns about the shellfish harvest areas and you directed your team to follow up with James Newsome as our representative on this matter.  This has not occurred to date and we would like to avoid another confrontational situation such as when HB201 was developed without stakeholder involvement.

      The areas designated as shellfish harvest area buffers in the current map on the GA DNR website (Ref 1) are greatly increased vs those previously defined.  

      · Is GA DNR CRD representing the green shaded areas as currently approved shellfish growing areas?

      Terms and Conditions preceding the map state (emphasis mine) “Anchorage restriction areas means those areas within the estuarine areas of this state in any location that lies within 300 feet of a marina, 150 feet from a marine structure other than a marina, or within 500 feet of approved commercial shellfish growing areas and designated public harvest areas as determined by the department.

      · As much of the expanded shellfish growing areas include federally defined navigable waterways below the low water mark, has the US Army Corps of Engineers approved the designation USACE Nationwide Permit 48 (Ref 2 and 3) ?

      · How much of the shellfish zones will be below the intertidal zone and be set aside for the mariculture technique utilizing cages suspended in the water column by floats?

      · HB501 specifies that subtidal harvest zone leases must first be evaluated for impact against other public uses.  (Ref 4).  Has this been completed?  If so, may we examine the evaluations?  If not, what opportunity for public comment will you make available?

      ” Prior to offering a subtidal water bottoms lease, the department shall consider compatibility with other public uses of the marine and estuarine resources in proximity of the lease area that include, but are not limited to, navigation, fishing, swimming, and other forms of recreation.”

      · GA DNR has adopted the federal framework of National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP), requiring shellfish waters meet the NSSP requirements before being designated as approved.  Have these assessments been completed for all indicated areas? (Ref 5)

      The boating group members seek a balance of interest among public access, waterfront property owners, and a resurgent shellfish industry.  

      Your feedback to clarify the above points would be most appreciated. 

      Coalition is comprised of:

      America’s Great Loop Cruisers Association

      CruisersNet

      DeFever Cruisers Association

      Marine Trawler Owners Association

      National Marine Manufacturers Association

      Waterway Guide

      Save Georgia’s Anchorages

       

      Cc:      Walter Rabon, GA DNR Deputy Commissioner,

      Doug Haymans, GA DNR Director, Coastal Resources Division

      Reference:

      1- https://gcmp.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b5a616ad152a462bad0b73cdb5eeb107

      2 – USACE Nationwide Permit 48  Commercial Shellfish Aquaculture Activities (Sections 10 and 404)

      3 – Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 https://www.epa.gov/cwa-404/section-10-rivers-and-harbors-appropriation-act-1899

      4 – HB 501 lines 341-346 http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/20192020/185110.pdf

      5 – US Food and Drug Administration – National Shellfish Sanitation Program https://www.fda.gov/media/98328/download

       

      October 15 update:

      SGA (Save Georgia’s Anchorages) and Georgia resident James Newsome on behalf of our boaters’ coalition followed up on his letter to GA DNR Commissioner Williams with a call to Deputy Commissioner Rabon today.
      James reports “GA DNR has acknowledged receipt of the email from the boating coalition group and is working on a response. Deputy Commissioner Rabon also agreed to host a conference call to discuss.”

       

      2 Facebook Likes, 2 Facebook Reactions

      Comments from Cruisers (3)

      1. James H. Newsome -  October 12, 2020 - 7:20 am

        Thanks Larry and CN for joining our efforts to address this latest challenge to anchoring issues on the GA coast.

        Reply to James
      2. James H Newsome -  October 12, 2020 - 7:18 am

        Larry, Thanks much to CN for joining our effort to address this latest challenge to anchoring issues in GA. Your support is greatly appreciated.

        Reply to James
      3. Ted Arisaka -  October 12, 2020 - 6:57 am

        Thanks to Cruisers’Net for your support and helping to raise awareness of this issue to the marine community.

        Reply to Ted
    • LNM: US Navy Testing, West of Destin, FL, Northern Gulf

      As stated below, this test area is approximately 15 NMs west of Destin, FL. This testing is a continuation of testing begun in August.

       

      FL – GULF OF MEXICO – DESTIN PASS – U.S. Navy Testing

      Continuing until approximately November 1, 2020, the U.S. Navy will be conducting test operations in an area generally located approximately 15 nautical miles west of Destin Pass, FL. The test area will include items on the ocean floor and/or moored near to the waters surface that are obstructions to navigation, extending from the beach out to approximate depth of 40 feet. These items will be guarded and/or buoyed while deployed for the duration of the test period. Additionally, helicopter operations will be conducted in the test area. The support/guard vessels
      include M/V TYSON B., which will be on station in the testing area during the test events. It is requested that vessels maintain a 1 nautical mile distance from the test area, while operations are in progress. Mariners should contact these support vessels via VHF-FM Channel 16, heed instructions given and stay a minimum of 1 nautical mile from the test vessels on station. U.S. Navy equipment has been deployed in the test area and will remain through the duration of the tests.
      Test area bound by the following approximate positions;
      North East corner: 30-23-12.0N 086-47-38.0W (30°23.2000N / 086°47.6333W, 30.386667 / -86.793889),
      North West corner: 30-23-01.0N 086-49-40.0W (30°23.0167N / 086°49.6667W, 30.383611 / -86.827778),
      South West corner: 30-20-44.0N 086-49-28.0W (30°20.7334N / 086°49.4666W, 30.345556 / -86.824444) and
      South East corner: 30-20-57.0N 086-47-18.0W (30°20.9500N / 086°47.3000W, 30.349167 / -86.788333) .

      Charts  11383 11385 11388   LNM 41/20

      Be the first to comment!

    • James H Newsome Responds to GA DNR Inquiry re Anchor Restriction Limits

      James H Newsome was one of the authors of the original protests over Georgia’s ultra restrictive HB 201, see Coalition Comments on Georgia’s HB 201, which resulted in the less restrictive HB 833. This issue now is not with the HB 833 legislation, but with the GA DNR’s implementation of those regulations. If you boat and anchor in Georgia, we invite your comments, so please let us hear from you.
       
      Once again, GA DNR rulemaking pertaining to navigation in the state’s coastal waters is causing confusion and frustration with recreational boaters and cruisers. The green colored “buffer regions around shellfish harvest and growing areas” which was recently announced on DNR’s web site appears to indicate that these entire areas are off limits to anchoring.
       
      A coalition of boating groups and cruising publications has reached out to DNR for additional information and clarification of the maps, but we have not received a reply at this time. However, information forwarded to me from an unnamed DNR representative stated that shellfish cages will not be placed within 150’ of any Federally maintain channel, and that the Army Corp of Engineers may apply more restrictive criteria when shell fishermen apply for permits at the federal level.
       
      How are boaters to interpret this information? Does this mean there are holes in DNR’s green colored areas that conflict with federal navigation law and are therefore not included in the restricted areas? 150’ from a Federally maintained channel essentially eliminates much of the ICW from inclusion in oyster bed designated areas, but 150’ from what part of the channel, the middle, the edge?
       
      At a minimum we are looking at 300’ from the center of the channel or essentially the length of a football field. With the elimination of the Magenta Line where is the center of the channel? Aids to Navigation (ATON) certainly cannot be used as indicators of the center channel. 
       
      A buffer for navigable channels, or exclusion from shellfish growing and harvesting areas, will exclude most of the marked channel in GA or at least a large part of it. So why has DNR colored these areas green when their own rule clearly excludes them for incorporation into shellfish beds? Would it not have been better to post accurate information for boaters to reference rather than confuse everyone again?
       

      Also, define “(ii)” below. Bottom leases may be granted in areas with minimum width of 200.’ Does this mean that eligible areas must be at least 200’ wide, or does it mean that areas under 200’ cannot be leased?

       “(6) Leasing of State-Owned Water Bottoms Terms, Siting, other Considerations.
      (a) The term of a state-owned water bottoms lease shall not exceed ten years and is subject to such provisions, requirements and conditions as determined by the Department. Leases may be renewed for additional terms if the lessee is in compliance with the terms of the current lease.
      (b) Subtidal water bottoms leases shall be sited in accordance with the following criteria: (i) In Approved Shellfish Growing areas as determined by the department;
      (ii) In areas with a minimum width of 200 feet at mean low water;
      (iii) In areas with a minimum depth of not less than 6 feet at mean low water; and….“
       
      Boaters in coastal waters depend on ATON and charts as roadmaps for navigating an already confusing waterway. We should not be required to reference inaccurate and non-conclusive maps on a difficult to find web site link to legally comply with GA law and rulemaking. This is a confusing and overbearing burden on boaters.
       
      Once again, it appears DNR has used the green brush rather liberally, and green does not mean “go,” it means “stop” don’t anchor. But where?
       
      Thanks,
       
      James H Newsome
      s/v CaiLeigh Anna – Coastal Cruising With Hugh & Suze 

      ICW Free Docks 

      Contributing Writer – Southwinds Magazine

      Be the first to comment!

    • GA DNR Responds to Inquiry re Oyster Cages Placement

      Ted Arisaka and Brad Pickle of Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Association have been seeking clarification on the anchoring restrictions implied in Liveaboard Anchoring Illustrative Map. See New Georgia Shellfish Harvest Area Permit Status Inquiry and Georgia HB 833 and Expanded Shellfish Areas.

      Response from GA DNR to Brad.  The answer he received does not correlate with what is shown on the DNR website maps.

      Ted
       

      Good morning.  I heard back from my contacts at GA DNR regarding placement of oyster cages within the AIWW and here is their response-

      “Oyster cages will not be placed within 150ft of any federally-maintained channel.  The ACOE may apply more strict criteria as shellfishermen go through their process, also.”

      They also sent me the Shellfish Rule which is attached. 

      Brad

       

      The pertinent lines from the rules (Shellfish Rule 391-2-4-.19) are: 

      (c) Any boundary of a subtidal water bottom lease shall not be within the following:
      (i) 150 feet of a federal project, such as a federally maintained channel;

      As Ted stated, this GA DNR rule does not correlate with what is shown on the DNR website maps.

      Larry

      Be the first to comment!

    • New Georgia Shellfish Harvest Area Permit Status Inquiry

      Efforts on behalf of boaters regarding Georgia’s anchoring restrictions continue with this letter by Ted Arisaka to the USACE. See Georgia HB 833 and Expanded Shellfish Areas.

      US Army Corps of Engineers

      Savannah District
      Regulatory Division
      .

      Dear Sirs:
       
      I am a recreational boater who enjoys the coastal waters of our East Coast and in particular, the coastal waters of Georgia.  I have followed with interest, the evolution of Georgia’s regulations around navigation / anchoring in their estuarine waters, starting with House Bill 201 in 2019 and replacement House Bill 833 in 2020.
       
      As a result of HB833, GA DNR has updated their definitions of no-anchoring zones as published on their website:  
       
       
      Among the various zones, one in particular, “shellfish harvest” areas (shaded in green) have expanded dramatically between 2019 and 2020.  These shellfish harvest areas are portrayed as “approved” on the GA DNR website and among the multiple requirements for approval is to receive a permit from US ACE for those areas in navigable waters.  If one examines the published maps, there are many areas in navigable waters as well as established channels demarcated by Aids To Navigation by USCG and charted by NOAA.  This also includes portions of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, which as you know is important not just for recreational boaters but also for commercial navigation.
       
      The reason for my email is to inquire as to the status of USACE approval of these shellfish harvest zones.  
       
      Thank you,
       
      Ted Arisaka

      1 Facebook Likes, 1 Facebook Reactions

      Be the first to comment!


    Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com