Visit Logged
  • Select Region
    • All Regions
    • VA to NC Line
    • North Carolina
    • South Carolina
    • Georgia
    • Eastern Florida
    • Western Florida
    • Florida Keys
    • Okeechobee Waterway
    • Northern Gulf
    • Bahamas
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Washington
    • Puerto Rico
    • Minnesota
    • Maryland
    • Tennessee
    Order by:
    • Good Suggestions for Manatee Pocket Anchorages, off the AICW Statute Mile 988


      Manatee Pocket is off the St. Lucie River between the AICW intersection and downtown Stuart, FL. There are two official anchoring areas, one on the waters of the large bay indenting the western banks of Manatee Pocket and another smaller area just to the south. See /?p=107612 for charts showing the official anchoring areas. And for a webcam shot of Manatee Pocket, see /?p=124827.

      Gas prices are cheaper the deeper you go into the pocket. Christmas week 2014.
      Great breakfast place whistle stop on the main street (A1A? I don’t recall, ask anyone) short walk from the end of the canal by Manatee Island bar and grill, tiki hut style bar (fun place).
      Twisted Tuna restaurant, great, really great sushi, at the head of the same canal, behind the second anchorage-deeper into the pocket.
      The Grove for your eye opener hole in the wall place.
      Other restaurants we did not have enough time in the pocket.
      RPink

      Click Here To View the Eastern Florida Cruisers’ Net Marina Directory Listing For Manatee Pocket

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of Manatee Pocket

      Be the first to comment!

    • Good Words for Walburg Creek Anchorage, off the AICW at Statute Mile 619N or 623.5S


      Walburg Creek shapes the east side of Walburg Island and the Waterway lies on the west side. Good depths and great beach combing. My young daughters always called the beach spooky because of the skeletal trees and dense forest to the east! While the creek has both a northern and southern entrance from the AICW, we prefer the northern passage, though there is still an unmarked shoal northwest of Middle Ground in St. Catherine’s Sound which must be bypassed. Our thanks to Skipper Lombardi for this report posted on AGLCA’s Forum.

      Walburg River, St. Catherines Is,
      This is also called the Graveyard of Trees as the island is moving south. We anchored in the north end of Walburg Creek by the beach. Fabulous beach, great walk among the “stranded” hardwood trees on the beach, and dog friendly. Public is limited to the beach area on the north side. It is a popular beach spot for folks from the area, so I would avoid the week ends. Weekdays are good.
      We anchored in the current and had great holding. Lots of boats seem to go down to the dock that you cannot use. We didn’t notice any difference in current or wind down there. This area is boot camp for bugs, so bring your
      No Natz. You might get lucky and see some of the Lemurs on the island, so look up.
      Corinne Lombardi

      Click Here To View the Georgia Anchorage Cruisers’ Net Anchorage Directory Listing For the Walburg Creek Anchorage

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of the Walburg Creek Anchorage

      Be the first to comment!

    • Good Report from Hampton Public Piers, north of Mile Zero, Hampton, VA


      Hampton Public Piers are located on the western shore of the Hampton River, approximately 11 nautical miles north of Statute Mile Zero.

      The Hampton Public Piers can be a convenient and affordable stop, not far off ICW routes. They have decent showers. Wifi is weak if not near the office.
      The setting is fairly urban. There are several restaurants and bars within walking distance, groceries a cab ride away. Road noise from the bridge and surrounding streets dies down somewhat after dark. Various locals walk the dockside paths at all hours.
      River currents and tides can be strong, crossways to the slips, so docking may be difficult, as the finger piers are quite short.
      Neil Woodside

      Click Here To View the VA to NC Cruisers’ Net Marina Directory Listing For Hampton Public Piers

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of Hampton Public Piers

      Be the first to comment!

    • Good Depths Reported at Fields Cut, AICW Problem Stretch Mile 575


      Northern Fields Cut, which was listed as a hazard to navigation (see /?p=143997) in Local Notices in August of 2014, is always an area to approach cautiously and at mid to high tide. Our thanks to Skipper Hale for this update. For a another depth report from Captains Mark and Diana Doyle, see /?p=144010

      April 11, 2015 northbound. We entered Fields Cut at about 1:45 after low water. We were carrying MLLW+ 2 feet. We stayed mid channel and never saw less than 10 feet. At the north end at R48A, we were half way between the buoy and shore and saw 20 feet. There is a slight shoal just after R48A but we saw 10 feet as we crossed it. We are a trawler drawing 4.5 feet and were running `point’ for a sailboat which drew 6’2’³. They also were fine all the way through.
      Cheers,
      Tom Hale
      Northbound on the ICW

      Click Here To View the Cruisers’ Net’s “AICW Problem Stretches” Listing For Northern Fields Cut

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To This AICW Problem Stretch

      Be the first to comment!

    • Good Depths Reported at Ashepoo-Coosaw Cutoff, AICW Problem Stretch Mile 517


      Skipper Hale’s passage is what we can all hope for through this Problem Stretch. However, as recent as this past October (/?p=145007), depths of less than 5ft were reported via ARGUS readings at the south end of the Cut. Tidal range is 5-7ft here and is certainly a factor in deciding to take the Cutoff or use the longer alternate route, see /?p=141157. Be sure to click the ARGUS option at the top of the ChartView page.

      Ashpoo Coosaw cut off. We are north bound and arrived at the south end 1.5 hour after low water. We were carrying +1.5′ as we entered. The lowest we saw was just inside G185 we had over 6 feet but we might have been too far to the right. At G177 we had 20 feet of water. Clearly it is quite dependent on where you are, and there were times we were hunting a bit to find the best water. 30 or 40 feet to either side of our track could have been quite different,I think you can still take 4″ draft through at low water. There were three trawlers ahead of us the largest one was 50 feet and she was almost half an hour head of us. I think this passage is doable for most of the tidal cycle. Certainly the 4 hours before high water and 2-3 hours after high water. A sailboat half an hour behind us followed our track and instructions. They saw nothing less than 8.5′
      Cheers,
      Tom Hale
      Northbound on the ICW
      Charleston SC

      Click Here To View the Cruisers’ Net’s “AICW Problem Stretches” Listing For the AICW/Ashepoo Coosaw Cutoff Problem Stretch

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To This AICW Problem Stretch

      Be the first to comment!

    • BoatUS News: A Case for Boating Safety Courses

      Boat U.S.BoatUS continues to be the nation’s leading advocate for boating safety and offering Boating Safety Classes is a big part of their work. SSECN is proud to have BoatUS as a SPONSOR!

      NEWS From BoatUS
      Boat Owners Association of The United States
      880 S. Pickett St., Alexandria, VA 22304

      FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
      When Things Went Wrong, Teen Boater Kept Cool
      The Case for Taking a Boating Safety Course

      15-year-old Matt Mainzer kept his cool when his flats boat started to sink. He says taking a boating safety education course gave him the knowledge to ensure everyone's safety aboard.

      15-year-old Matt Mainzer kept his cool when his flats boat started to sink. He says taking a boating safety education course gave him the knowledge to ensure everyone’s safety aboard.

       

      TAMPA, FL, April 9, 2015 ‘“ When 15-year Matt Mainzer decided to take a couple of friends out boating one Sunday afternoon in late March, little did he know that he would find himself and his friends floating in life jackets hanging on to the overturned hull of the teen’s 17-foot flats boat awaiting rescue. But according to Mainzer, his boating safety education would help him survive the day. A graduate of the no-cost online boating safety course provided by the BoatUS Foundation for Boating Safety and Clean Water, Mainzer said, ‘˜I wouldn’t have known what I needed to know if I hadn’t taken the boating safety course.’

      Of course most folks would recognize Mainzer’s ability to keep his cool and being prepared as the reason for the young trio’s successful rescue. According to Mainzer, as water started to fill the boat through a rapidly widening crack in the hull – eventually causing the three teens to jump overboard – the quick thinking Mainzer had everyone in life jackets.

      Using a cell phone in a waterproof case, Mainzer had also already advised a friend of their predicament initiating a rescue response. Once the three teens were floating in the waters of the Tampa Bay, he remembered keep everyone hanging on to the boat’s hull, of which only a small portion of the bow was above water. And his boating guests, two female teens, also remained calm and followed their captain’s instructions. Rescuers were on scene in minutes.

      `Matt’s ability to stay calm and take decisive action saved them from harm,’ said BoatUS Foundation President Chris Edmonston. `And I’m sure Matt’s parents instilled in him a great sense of respect for boating safety. But we are also very pleased he was able to take away some key knowledge from our online boating safety course, like always having life jackets accessible and ready to go. Once water started entering the boat they were easy to put on. So often boaters keep them hidden in places that essentially render them useless.’

      Mainzer, who has been boating since he was a two-year old, added, `The BoatUS Foundation Online Boating Safety Course was easy to take and wasn’t boring. I learned a lot.’ As the boating season begins, boaters can find the BoatUS Foundation online courses at BoatUS.org/courses.

      ###

      The BoatUS Foundation for Boating Safety and Clean Water is a national leader promoting safe, clean and responsible boating. Funded primarily by donations from the over half-million members of Boat Owners Association of The United States (BoatUS), the non-profit provides innovative educational outreach directly to boaters and anglers with the aim of reducing accidents and fatalities, increasing stewardship of America’s waterways and keeping boating safe for all. A range of boating safety courses ‘“ including 33 free state courses ‘“ can be found at BoatUS.org/courses.

      Be the first to comment!

    • Model Letter re SB 1548 by Jim Healy

      Here is a well-written, insightful letter to Florida legislators that should serve as a model for those of you who plan to write in opposition to SB 1548, see /?p=147754. Thank you Captain Healy.

      Chairman Hon. Alan Hays
      Vice Chairman Hon. Oscar Braynon
      Senator Hon. Thad Altman
      Senator Hon. Charles Dean
      Senator Hon. Tom Lee
      Senator Hon. Gwen Margolis
      Senator Hon. Wilton Simpson

      Dear Chairman Hays and members of the Senate Committee on General Government Operations:

      I am writing in reference to SB1548, titled `An Act Related to Vessel Safety.’ I am a legal resident of Green Cove Springs, Clay County, and an active boater. I have previously written to Sen. Rob Bradley requesting that he decline to support Senate Bill 1548 in its present form. While I do not object to the core safety-related provisions of SB1548, I do object to the anchoring setback provisions contained in the bill. The setback provisions reduce the availability of safe anchoring locations all across Florida, thereby acting against the goal of promoting safety in navigation on state waters. Furthermore, the setback provisions represent revocation of lawful pubic access rights to public trust lands. These lands are held by the state in trust for use by the public, not for the aesthetic preferences or personal use of adjoining waterfront landowners or for the promotion of waterfront business interests.

      Although limitations on anchoring may favor certain business interests, the origin of the setback provisions in the bill appears to be isolated disputes between waterfront landowners and occupants of anchored vessels. Some of these disputes have been highly publicized, but do not justify a sweeping statewide law which would restrict the rights and freedoms of hundreds of thousands of boaters throughout the maritime waters of coastal Florida. These disputes are not based on safety concerns. They can and should be resolved on a case-by-case basis through noise and nuisance proceedings in the judicial branch of municipal, county and state government.

      House Bill 7123 deals with derelict vessels without changing current Florida-wide anchoring rights. When we first moved to Florida in 2004, there was a confusing and inconsistent patchwork of local, city and county laws that restricted or disallowed anchoring in Florida’s intracoastal public trust waters. Compliance with that patchwork of local ordinances was impossible. Florida Statute 327.60 ended that inconsistency in anchoring policies and local manipulation of navigation rights and rules. At this time, HB7123 creates an `at risk’ category of boats and gives local governments new tools to manage these situations. Because local governments sometimes seek to promulgate anchoring restrictions as a means of managing problems with “at risk” and derelict vessels, I strongly believe that HB7123 is an excellent step to deter vessels from becoming derelict in the first place.

      I ask that SB1548 be aligned with HB7123. I also ask that as the opportunity presents itself in the future, that the committee act to maintain the statewide consistency of anchoring rules the legislature previously established in FS 327.60, and act to prohibit local or regional exceptions to this state wide policy.
      Thank you for your consideration.
      James B. Healy
      Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Daytona Beach, FL
      http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com
      Monk 36 Hull #132

      Be the first to comment!

    • Luxury Boat Stranded in West Palm Beach, AICW Statute Mile ?


      If you have witnessed this apparently grounded vessel, please send us a location. This story is from WPTV News 5 in West Palm Beach.

      Luxury boat stranded in Intracoastal Waterway in West Palm Beach
      by Jason Hackett


      WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. – If you were anywhere near the Intracoastal Waterway Thursday in West Palm Beach you probably saw a strange sight ‘“ a boat just sitting there apparently stuck.
      It prompted quite a few calls to our newsroom.
      NewsChannel 5 made some calls and found out that it ran aground earlier in the day.
      We also learned that a tow company, Boat U.S., was at the scene trying to help the boat out, but it was unsuccessful.
      It was the topic of the day for people walking along the Intracoastal.
      Much of the speculation focused on what happened to the boat and the people on board.
      `They’re in West Palm Beach somewhere,’ says Geri Vistein, who watched the boat from the shore. `They could be listening to the music over there at a fancy restaurant’¦who knows what they’re doing?’

      26.713000503366896,-80.05366060838541

      Be the first to comment!

    • Updates on Fort Pierce Inlet


      Fort Pierce Inlet remains closed to navigation for vessels over 6ft draft. See /?p=147108 for the events related to this tragic incident. Our thanks to Captain Baier and Anne Maurer for these updates.

      This salvage operation has been going on since February 24th. The Fort Pierce inlet will be restricted or closed once again to attempt removal of the sunken barge.
      http://www.tcpalm.com/news/local-news/st-lucie-county/boater-traffic-restricted-as-sunken-barge-recovery-continues-at-fort-pierce-inlet_69715710
      Chuck Baier on AGLCA’s Forum

      We just wanted to give you a heads up on the Fort Pierce Inlet. The inlet will be closed beginning @ 9AM on Saturday morning for boats that have a draft bigger than 6 foot. All leisure and fishing boats will have no problem getting through.
      Anne Maurer
      Fort Pierce City Marina – A SALTY SOUTHEAST CRUISERS’ NET SPONSOR!

      When in doubt, call SeaTow [or TowboatUS] on CH16 ahead of time. They gave us the green light on March 30th when we were headed to Vero Beach after the Palm Beach Boat Show… when earlier warnings had been issued. No problem.
      Bob Johnstone on AGLCA Forum

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of Fort Pierce Inlet

      Click Here To View the Cruisers’ Net’s Eastern Florida Marina Directory Listing For Fort Pierce City Marina

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of Fort Pierce City Marina

      Be the first to comment!

    • BoatUS: Spring Commissioning

      Boat U.S.BoatUS continues to be the nation’s leading advocate for boating safety, including spring launch preparations. SSECN is proud to have BoatUS as a SPONSOR!

      BoatUS.com
      President’s Corner –
      From BoatUS President, Margaret Podlich

      As the daffodils start to peek through my mulch, I know it’s time to take a peek under the boat’s shrink-wrap and find a warm weekend afternoon to conduct the Spring Right of Passage, Spring Commissioning!
      Thankfully, our experts here at BoatUS have put together a thorough checklist of all that is needed to ready your boat for another season out on the water, including this video walk-through on a cabin cruiser.

      A proper Spring Commissioning may prevent your boat from sinking at the dock, as many owners are unaware of leaks and water on board after heavy winter snowfall and spring rains. In this article, we question what may have caused a 20′ runabout to sink before the season began. Lesson learned? Take an hour or two to check on your boat’s condition before you head out.

      See you on the water!
      Margaret

      Click Here for the rest of the news.

      Be the first to comment!

    • Marine Fire Prevention – A Book Review

      A Book Review
      Posted to Global Maritime Analysis with Joseph Keefe (by Joseph Keefe) on March 24, 2015

      Marine Fire Prevention, Firefighting, and Fire Safety by Captain Sean Tortora, USMS

      Firefighting probably will never be a (hot) topic for discussion at the breakfast table, during leisure time or possibly any other venue. On the other hand, I can think of few things more important to a merchant mariner ‘“ or any seafarer, for that matter. That said; (Captain) Sean Tortora’s comprehensive text entitled Marine Fire Prevention, Firefighting, and Safety, published just this past year, is a worthy and compelling `read.’ Comprehensive in its coverage, concise in its delivery, the 176-page manual is simply the most complete and readable firefighting guide that I have ever come across.

      Tortora is a Master Mariner with twenty-five years experience at sea and also has earned an unlimited Master of towing vessels and Master of underway replenishment vessels. During his career at sea, Capt. Tortora had command of many different classes of vessels, including tankers, dry cargo, break bulk, ammunition, ocean towing and salvage, special mission, as well as underway replenishment vessels. Capt. Tortora has had extensive experience combating serious shipboard fires, including major engine room fires and cargo hold fires. The SUNY Maritime graduate holds a BS in Marine Transportation and MS in International Transportation Management. Today, he is a professor in the Department of Marine Transportation at the United States Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, New York.

      Fighting a fire or addressing an emergency aboard ship should be an organized and standardized event. Nevertheless, how that evolution occurs on board a U.S. Navy Ship and a merchant vessel will vary, sometimes simply as a function of the number of people (or paucity thereof). I can remember attending firefighting school in the early 1980’s in Freehold, NJ, along with an entire section from a U.S. Navy ship. And, I’ve done it within the last five years, in accordance with STCW requirements as part of a Basic Safety Training (BST) course in a commercial setting. The two events could not have been more different.

      And then, there is the U.S. Military Sealift Command structure, where civilian mariners ‘“ typically in much larger concentrations than that which a standard commercial vessel would allow ‘“ work on board and alongside U.S. Navy personnel. The mix in styles is, at a minimum, an interesting thing to observe ‘“ a hybrid approach to things that you don’t often see in the commercial world. Tortora has seen and done it all and he understands how it all comes together. Lesson 1, dedicated to Shipboard Organization, ties it all together.

      I admit to having a bit of a soft spot for Tortora since much of his sea time was spent on Military Sealift Command tonnage and a good portion of that on underway replenishment vessels. That’s where I started and because of it, I vividly remember the fire and emergency drills aboard my MSC vessel(s). And, that’s what I like most about Tortora’s Study Guide: he has experienced and understands the differences inherent in the approach to firefighting on board both government and commercial vessels. He also understands that the basic concepts of the task don’t necessarily change, no matter what kind of vessel you sail on or who you work for.

      Tortora’s guide was prepared for use with U.S. Coast guard-approved Marine Fire Fighting and Safety courses and meets the requirements of the IMO’s Standards of Training, Watchkeeping (STCW 1978), as amended. Beyond this, the text was produced so as to modernize, streamline, and simplify the original text, Marine Fire Prevention, Firefighting and fire Safety, published by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration, in 1972. Today, the U.S. Government Printing Office no longer prints the document. Never fear: Captain Tortora happily stepped into the breach.

      In the end, the guide updates readers on the equipment and techniques that have since been developed in the last forty years. That’s no small task, but Tortora breaks it down into 12 easy to follow lessons which include learning objectives, key points of emphasis and in a manner that that minimizes the busy work while maximizing the course content. Professional mariners and educators alike, if contemplating just one professional reading purchase this year, should put Tortora’s Marine Fire Prevention, Firefighting, and Safety at the top of their list. ‘“ MarPro.

      Note: Published by Schiffer Publishing, Ltd. / ISBN: 978-0-87033-635-5

      Joseph Keefe is the lead commentator of MaritimeProfessional.com. Additionally, he is Editor of both Maritime Professional and MarineNews print magazines. He can be reached at jkeefe@maritimeprofessional.com or at Keefe@marinelink.com. MaritimeProfessional.com is the largest business networking site devoted to the marine industry. Each day thousands of industry professionals around the world log on to network, connect, and communicate.

      Be the first to comment!

    • Weakening Gulf Stream

      Of special interest to our off-shore cruisers is this article from Tucson News Now by Dan Bronis.

      The Gulf Stream is weakening, bad news for the East Coast
      Posted: Apr 05, 2015 8:04 PM EDT
      By Dan Bronis

      TUCSON, AZ (Tucson News Now) – The mild climate in Europe may soon be getting colder, matching the climate of the northeast United States. The reasoning for this looks to be the Gulf Stream in the Atlantic Ocean.

      The Gulf Stream brings milder winters to Europe than what other places at the same latitude experience, especially in winter. But this could all be changing as it appears the Gulf Stream of the Atlantic Ocean is getting weaker, allowing deeper lows to move over Europe.

      The Gulf Stream is a “river” of water in the Atlantic Ocean that rides up the East Coast of the United States into the northern Atlantic Ocean. This “river” is warmer than the surrounding water and can help bring warmer weather to Europe in winter. The Gulf Stream over the last century has weakened, allowing Europe to experience colder winters. With most of the weakening occurring since 1970.

      Credit: NASA. The Gulf Stream riding north along the East Coast.

      The Gulf Stream is not the only ocean stream in the world. Every ocean has streams of warm and cold waters, all of these play a major role on the climate of the Earth. Climate change has been debated on whether it would have an impact on these ocean “rivers” but it is becoming more clear that climate change is weakening and strengthening some of these streams.

      Be the first to comment!

    • Did You Know This?

      This is good information for all you beach-combers and wildlife lovers.

      Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

      gopher

      Gopher Tortoise

      gopher2

      Gopher Tortoise Hatchlings

      All turtles are not equal; the gopher tortoise lives on land so don’t ‘˜help’ it into water

      Last month, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) received three known reports of well-intentioned good Samaritans incorrectly releasing gopher tortoise hatchlings into the ocean. Gopher tortoises cannot swim well and can easily drown. Because gopher tortoises often nest in dunes adjacent to sea turtle nesting beaches, correct identification of these terrestrial animals is important before deciding what action, if any, is necessary.

      To distinguish gopher tortoises from sea turtles, simply inspect their limbs from a distance: Gopher tortoises have toes, with claws on each toe. Sea turtles have flippers with only one or two claws present on each foreflipper. Proper identification can be achieved without handling the animals. Please see our gopher tortoise photos at http://bit.ly/1ysPccM for help discerning gopher tortoises from sea turtles.

      All five species of sea turtles found in Florida are federally endangered or threatened and managed under the Endangered Species Act as well as under Florida Statutes; the gopher tortoise is listed under state law. If you spot any of these species in danger on the beach, please do not disturb the animal. Instead, call the FWC’s Wildlife Alert Hotline at 888-404-FWCC (3922) or call #FWC or *FWC on your cell phone.

      Be the first to comment!

    • Eagles & Alligators in North and South Carolina

      My family can second these recommendations on observing wildlife in South and North Carolina, as posted on AGLCA’s Forum. These sections are some of the prettiest passages in the Waterway. You can find charts to each the ICW miles given by using the “STATUTE MILE/LAT-LON WIDGET” at the top of our Homepage.

      Going north on the ICW in South Carolina near mile 425 up through South Santee River keep your eyes peeled for several eagles who live in the area. Every single time we go through this area we see them. Next section is what I have deemed alligator alley is from North Santee River curve R16 through mile 416, one year in mid-May we spotted 18 on the banks and in the water. Also keep eyes open in the Waccamaw River from mile 385 to 377 we’ve spotted them in this section as well.
      Pam & Eric on Pier Pressure
      headed home to Beaufort, NC

      Be the first to comment!

    • Praise for Inlet Marina, St. Augustine, FL, AICW Statute Mile 775.5


      Inlet Marina, A SALTY SOUTHEAST CRUISERS’ NET SPONSOR, borders the eastern banks of the Waterway, immediately south of the Vilano Beach high-rise bridge. We continue to hear good things about Inlet Marina and their personal service.

      These people are fantastic!! We got our first fuel since we left home. Overnight on their dock. Wonderful restaurant.
      Phil and Sandy on board m/v Options

      Displaying 20150331_173433.jpg

      Click Here To View the Eastern Florida Cruisers’ Net Marina Directory Listing For Inlet Marina

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of Inlet Marina

      Be the first to comment!

    • More Opinions on Florida’s SB 1548

      Here are a number of well worded essays from Florida residents, some opposing SB 1548, a Florida Senate bill restricting anchoring, from newspress.com and some explaining the need for such restrictions.

      Insane bill proposes to strangle Florida cruising
      W. DeHaven Porter 2:48 p.m. EDT March 29, 2015
      porter
      Oh, the ignominy of it! Me, a lifelong Republican, about to take up pen and castigate a sitting member of the Florida Republican Party.
      The subject of my discontent? It is Florida SB1548, a proposed draconian bill that would absolutely destroy the reputation of my home state as a cruising mecca for thousands of boaters who relish the freedom to anchor their vessels in a wide choice of beautiful and convenient anchorages. The unintended byproduct of which, I am sure, will be their departure to more welcoming cruising destinations such as the Bahamas or, if opened, the crystal clear waters of Cuba. Loss of their patronage at Florida businesses and marine facilities will certainly exacerbate already tough times and result in layoffs and countless job losses in Florida’s multimillion-dollar marine industries.
      State Sen. Charles S. Dean’s spiteful bill would remove thousands of Florida’s finest anchorages from cruisers’ itineraries. He obviously means to placate self-absorbed coastal residents who get upset when they awake to see a boat anchored anywhere within their range of vision. Indeed, the bill restricts boaters from anchoring overnight within 200 feet of developed waterfront property (single family, multifamily, townhouse or condo.) 200 feet! Good grief, when did God reserve enjoyment rights for thousands of miles of Florida coastline for fat cats living in waterfront gated communities?
      Ah, but you say surely if cruisers are denied anchorages, they will flock to the marinas and thus inflate the pocketbooks of marina operators and local businesses. Not so my friend.
      It may be so in the landlocked brain of the Republican Dean, a career politician who hails from landlocked Inverness. But most cruisers will simply go elsewhere. It is Sen. Dean who has launched this monstrosity of a bill. Of course, he lives too far inland to smell salt air, so perhaps he should be excused for his ignorance of the thousands upon thousands of U.S. and Canadian boaters who annually enjoy the coastal waterways of our gorgeous state. Anyone who lives near a coast is well aware of cruisers’ presence and the millions they contribute to local economies.
      Having been among their numbers for over seven years of cruising life, I hasten to point out that most cruisers not only patronize Florida marinas, but also alternate between renting a slip and hanging overnight on the hook (anchoring for you landlubbers). Indeed, my fondest memories are of many enjoyable anchorages and other congenial boaters enjoying a quiet spot in space and time. Empirical evidence indicates that most cruisers do the same.
      Local water Nazis will ticket offenders. The miscreants are then ordered to physically report to the county court for fining (up to $250). When? Put yourself in the position of a cruiser who must put off your well-planned cruising expectations, rent a car and find the county courthouse at some future specified date, not to mention finding a marina slip in which to leave your vessel. Of course you could just pick up the hook and depart, but that would mean a second-degree misdemeanor charge and a fine of $500. Government out of control? You bet.
      Sen. Dean’s misguided bill is filed under the heading of water safety. It has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with stroking wealthy campaign contributors who think their purchase of waterfront property has granted them exclusive rights to the enjoyment of water views and sunsets.
      Write, email or call your Florida senator and demand equal rights for boaters by defeating SB 1548. I am.
      W. DeHaven Porter lives in Fort Myers.

      From AGLCA’s Forum:
      In the interest of trying to present both sides of an argument, let me try to explain why the Florida anchoring ban surfaced again in this year’s Florida legislature. First of all let me begin by saying I am a jet skier that has completed over half the great loop. As a member of both the Coast Guard Auxiliary and the U S Power Squadron, I have been teaching boating safety over 30 years. In my boating safety classes I always say “There is no such thing as a bad jet ski. . . . There are only bad Jet skiers”. You know, the jet skiers who don’t take a boating safety course, don’t obey the rules of the road and leave wakes everywhere they go.
      As a current owner of three waterfront properties and former owner of two others, I definitely see the land owner’s desire to restrict the area adjacent and directly behind their waterfront property. Public waters are
      held in the public trust but, unfortunately, there are a few (only a few) “bad” boaters who anchor out, play loud music, throw trash into the water and party hardy into the wee hours and abuse their public trust. You are
      welcome to come by my dock any Saturday night and spend the night. I will let you listen and experience what it is like to live on waterfront property with a live band and bar that plays loud music 1/2 mile away. It is because of these “few” bad boaters (or bad bar owners) that waterfront property owners want them banned after normal quiet time hours. Not banned all the time just after “reasonable” quiet hours.
      Several members in this forum believe this is a “rich land baron” issue. This is not a “have” verses the “have nots” clash. This is about restoring peace and quiet to public waters after the sun goes down. Just like most
      marinas have “quiet” hours, land owners are asking for similar civil rules.
      I hope responsible boaters like the members of AGLCA will find a way to help the waterfront owners restore civil behavior and tranquility to the public waters we all love and respect.
      Douglas Townes
      Atlanta, GA

      I can certainly understand your frustrations. HOWEVER, there are laws and ordinances already in affect that that address ALL of these issues. As a homeowner, why are you not outraged that local law enforcement is not doing
      their job to enforce these regulations? Instead of taking a negative statewide stand against all boaters. If cars speed up and down the street in front of your house, will you push for a law forbidding cars from using your street? I doubt it, yet you advocate the same treatment for boaters.
      The obvious answer would be for the police to enforce the speed limit. And there in lies the problem with both these regulations and the “excuses” used to push them forward.
      Chuck Baier and Susan Landry
      AGLCA Forum

      April 13, 2015
      First, as a member of the MTOA which doesn’t seem to want to get in the fight over FL anchoring, I applaud and thank you for picking up the slack. I am already a member of BoatUS and will be joining AGLCA shortly.
      Second, I have made my donation to help you in this cause. I’d like it to be more, but as you know a boat is an expensive hobby, lifestyle.
      Third, I don’t know if SSCA is a membership organization and if so I have looked all over your site for the ability to join and couldn’t find anywhere to do so. Please advise.
      Thanks again and keep up the fight.
      Charles Williamson
      April 14
      I am pleased to say the MTOA has sent their letter to the politicos voicing the power of MTOA membership (5000+) and it’s opposition to the anchoring debacle in FL.
      Charles Williamson

      Editor’s Note: You may join Seven Seas Cruising Association by going to their Homepage and scrolling down the left hand column to SSCA MEMBERSHIP JOIN TODAY

      Comments from Cruisers (11)

      1. Gary -  April 3, 2015 - 7:39 pm

        The 200 foot rule from shore makes sense, anchoring closer than 200 feet just plain lacks manners. I see people dumping human waste in the 200 foot range and because some people just give old junk boats away they have become far too common for bums to use with Antique registrations it is like a free place to stay and most are non boaters. I have no problem with boaters that moor at a safe yet respectable distance from shore.

        Reply to Gary
      2. Joan Clark -  April 3, 2015 - 6:41 pm

        I’ve been fighting anchoring and live aboard laws for over 40 yrs, For every complaint there is another solution other than banning anchoring. But let’s be honest: who anchors overnight within 200′ ?

        Reply to Joan
      3. John Kettlewell -  April 3, 2015 - 11:16 am

        Mr. Townes, if noise is the problem, why not a tightened up noise regulation instead? Frankly, in 35 years of cruising up and down the coast I can’t ever recall being disturbed by a noisy group of sailors, so why not simply outlaw powerboats? Of course that is absurd, but I am just trying to point out how the remedy proposed here is absurd too. Regulate the offensive activity. Don’t ban all boaters because a very few make too much noise and party all night. In fact, there are already laws on the books that regulate pollution, excess noise, boats in unsafe conditions, etc. It is not a lack of laws but a lack of commonsense enforcement. A bill requiring better education and training for marine law enforcement would make a lot more sense and would actually do something useful, while still leaving the public waters of the state available to all responsible boaters.

        Reply to John
      4. Dave Skolnick -  April 3, 2015 - 9:37 am

        After our discussion captured in a recent AGLCA podcast Kim was kind enough to invite me to participate in this forum.
        Seven Seas Cruising Association, a small volunteer-driven organization, is leading the charge against restrictions on the rights of cruisers to anchor in Florida. We have been working on this issue for many years. We work closely with BoatUS and NMMA and now with AGLCA to carry the voice of boaters to Tallahassee (as we have on similar issues in Maryland, Connecticut, and California).
        SSCA publishes updates on the evolving situation on our website, our own Forum, and on our Facebook page. I’ll do my best to keep the AGLCA up to date through this forum as well, although Kim may be faster than I – she is
        now on our distribution list. It was great for our team on the ground in Tallahassee for Kim to join us at the Senate hearing on Tuesday this week.
        regards, dave
        Dave Skolnick S/V Auspicious
        SSCA Immediate Past President
        SSCA Concerned Cruisers’ Committee

        Reply to Dave
      5. David Tarbox -  April 3, 2015 - 7:54 am

        I am wholly against the proposed regulations and think the cruising public should be more emphatic in our response. My family and I have been cruising Florida for more than 30 years and avoid shoreline residences wherever possible feeling that they are the ones who are degraded our enjoyment of anchoring in quiet coves surrounded by nature. One of the comments to the FWC survey was “If they want to share my view, let them pay for it”. Since many of us started cruising before the mansions were built, perhaps we should consider seeking compensation from them for the damage they have wrought. We were there first!!!

        The proposal that anchoring be prohibited near docks is even more absurd. Many mega-mansions somehow (I wonder how?) convinced regulators to permit the construction of docks extending hundreds of feet from the shore to deeper water for their boats and now want us to stay 200′ from those docks. Perhaps actions should be taken against agencies for their lax enforcement of environmental regulations and allowing the destruction of ecosystems they are charged with protecting

        The Florida legislature should be embarrassed to be wasting tax payers time on such an absurd bill. How many of those shorline residents really support more government regulations? Any Tea Party members among them?

        Reply to David
      6. Capt David Burnham -  April 3, 2015 - 4:53 am

        Re: Protect Boating Access to Florida Waters ‑ Reject SB 1548

        Dear Elected official:

        Sir or Madam,
        The boating public heaves yet another collective sigh as our protective government ponders yet another theft of the public trust. You seldom hear the boating public cry out in anguish as low vertical clearance bridges close off navigable waters to commerce except for the smallest craft, nor do they protest when private property owners fill in Florida wetlands and destroy the native habitat so that they can have a private view of what was previously enjoyed by the boating public only.
        Private property owners are allowed to build permanent structures out over navigable public trust waters so that they can have private access to the waterway and then some will insist that they also purchased the water under their dock and the view above the water as well.
        If private property owners do not want to have the public anchoring a boat near their private property, do not buy waterfront property.
        I am a waterfront property owner in Florida with private access to the public’s navigable waterway and reject the idea that most of the public’s safe anchorages are being considered off limits to boaters because the shoreline has been polluted by turning wetlands into private property and I expect my views to be represented by my elected officials who will reject SB 1548.

        Sincerely,

        David Burnham
        s/v Morning Star…Synergy…Sweet Life

        In addition: banning boaters because of a few noisy after hours problems in your back yard will not bring you peace. Move to the mountains…there you will find peace.

        Reply to Capt
      7. Steve Adams -  April 2, 2015 - 5:59 pm

        I attended a town council meeting a few years back, the meeting was in reference to anchoring rights adjacent to the town, Gulfport, FL. One of the property owners stood up to say, “I pay thousands in taxes every year, so when I wake up in the morning, fix my cup of coffee, and sit down to relax on my back porch, I don’t want to look out over the water and see boats.”

        Evidently this is the crux of this entire issue. Sen. Charles Dean, has crony’d up to please his donors, who believe that where ever they plant their fat bottoms, they’re entitled to control the entire line of sight. They want to make the world their masterpiece, at the expense of everyone else.

        Not one consideration was paid to those that have enjoyed Florida waters for generations. Not one consideration was given to the boating public. Not one consideration was given to Florida tradition and the huge marine industry that keeps Florida, afloat, so to speak.

        Isn’t it so predictable? As soon as someone takes the helm of their own little patch, they are eager and ready to control everything else to force-fit their own little vision.

        Frankly, I am sick and tired of government mandating every-single-matter of life. And it does so by taking things away from anyone it wants to, only to please a cherished few.

        And, frankly, I am a born native of Florida, and you’re taking away my State!

        Reply to Steve
        • Steve Adams -  April 2, 2015 - 6:12 pm

          Forgot to note. I am in full support of HB 7123. At least someone in government is actually thinking clear about the subject.

          Reply to Steve
      8. Dick Mills -  April 2, 2015 - 3:27 pm

        Mr. Townes might just as well be annoyed by bad neighbors, or bad people using the street in front of his house. WIll he ask for a 200 foot buffer zone around all sides of his property, not just the waterfront side?

        Reply to Dick
      9. Jim Healy -  April 2, 2015 - 3:09 pm

        It is clear that Mr. Townes point about inconsiderate boaters is valid. There are some inconsiderate boaters. It is equally clear that confiscation of public trust waters is not a proportional corrective action. Most communities have noise ordinances; certainly that’s true in Florida. Local landowners barraged by nose can call local authorities and expect a remedy in local justice courts. A statewide ban on anchoring is simply not an appropriate remedy.

        Reply to Jim
      10. Donna Holton -  April 2, 2015 - 11:06 am

        I think Douglas Townes misses the point. If the problem is noise, ban noise. If he can hear the bar half a mile away, it is obvious that keeping loud boats 200 feet from his dock won’t help him. We who anchor out don’t like the noise any more than he does.

        This anchoring rights issue matters to us. Right now we are deciding whether to spend another winter in Florida, or to ship our boat back to the Caribbean where we have spent 13 winters. Anchoring rights are just one factor in our decision, but we have spent a lot of money on Florida marinas, marine services and restaurants this year. If we go, we would be a good example of lost business for the state.

        Donna Holton
        m/v Freedom

        Reply to Donna
    • Excellent Report from Redington Shores Anchorage, GICW Statute Mile 125.5


      Redington Shores Anchorage is found on the charted cove south of unlighted daybeacon #1 off the northwestern tip of Boca Ciega Bay. Our thanks to Laura for this thorough description of this Gulf Waterway anchorage.

      We stayed at this anchorage for 2 nights week of March 23rd and it was SUPER nice. We were guided in by the instructions in Claiborne’s Cruising Guide and he was spot on. It is very shallow in the middle of this anchorage, so hugging the Southern shoreline it was plenty deep. There are two restaurants nearby, Seabreeze and Wahoo’s – we ate at Seabreeze one night and the food was good. There is Happy Hour all day every day $2 drafts and they have some inexpensive bar food items ($4.99 grouper cheeks, and some other tasty items as well) There is a public park with a dock to get off and walk across the street to the beach. There is a 7-Eleven within walking distance for ice ($2.99 a bag) and whatnot. There’s a trolley that runs the whole length of the beach as well, if you really want to go exploring, it’s very reasonable. The water was deepest just off the fishing boat fleet, we had no problems. There is a bank of high rise condos to the South but they didn’t bother us, and most people were nice. We even had one guy track us down at the bar as he admired our boat out there, and we met some nice folks. We will definitely be back to this anchorage.
      Laura

      Click Here To View the Western Florida Cruisers’ Net Anchorage Directory Listing For Redington Shores Anchorage

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of Redington Shores Anchorage

      Be the first to comment!

    • Report on Florida’s SB 1548 Hearing

      The introduction of a senate bill restricting anchoring rights has raised many voices in opposition. See /?p=147397. This report on yesterday’s committee hearing in Tallahassee by Kim Russo was posted on AGLCA’s Forum, www.greatloop.org.

      There were no surprises at today’s Florida Senate Committee hearing on this issue. Testimony was kept to an absolute minimum because votes on six bills were scheduled for a two hour time period, and the bill with the provision to prohibit overnight anchoring was the last on the agenda. The committee voted unanimously in favor of the bill. But AGLCA’s voice was heard, as was that of SCCA and Boat U.S., who had lobbyists and representatives there. Chairman Dean’s comments during the hearing, and in a brief conversation afterward, suggest that he is willing to work to find a compromise that meets all parties’ needs. Senator Dean has been a proponent of maintaining the rights of boaters to anchor in the public waterways in the past, so the next step is to work with him to make sure he understands our opposition to anchoring restrictions. The next step in the process for the bill is a vote before another committee, which is likely to happen next week. I’ll keep you posted.
      Kim
      Kim Russo
      Director
      America’s Great Loop Cruisers’ Association

      Be the first to comment!

    • Good Report from Seafood Shack Marina, GICW Statute Mile 87


      Claiborne’s Comments: The Seafood Shack Marina and Restaurant guard the eastern flanks of the Western Florida ICW, only a few miles south of the Waterway’s entrance into Tampa Bay, hard by the Cortez Bridge. The marina part of this operation has always seemed a bit “casual” to me over the years, but our dining experience here has always been good.

      Just spent two nights at the Seafood Shack and can confirm the comments above from 2012. Darryl the dock master was very helpful and friendly, and the docks were still old and beat up, but both the marina and restaurant are under new management and renovations are underway. There were some new finger piers and replacement of the main docks and electric service were both ongoing while were there. The shore heads are also slated for a much needed facelift. Pretty good food at the restaurant, and several other good choices within walking distance. When renovations are complete, this will be a good choice.
      Jonathan Gorham

      Click Here To View the Cruisers’ Net’s Western Florida Marina Directory Listing For Seafoof Shack Marina

      Click Here To Open A Chart View Window, Zoomed To the Location of the Seafoof Shack Marina

      Comments from Cruisers (2)

      1. Bruce Franz -  April 7, 2015 - 6:40 pm

        I just spent a week at Seafood Shack! Had a great time, Staff was helpful, fun, supportive. Put it on your “places to visit”. Rent a car and enjoy the whole area!
        Upgrades are happening every week!
        Bruce Franz
        Dickerson 41

        Reply to Bruce
      2. Laura -  April 1, 2015 - 10:39 am

        Good to know! Thanks for the update. We passed by that way over Xmas and thought about stopping, but didn’t. Will definitely put that on our “places to visit” list.

        Reply to Laura

    Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com