Our thanks to Ted Arisaka for sharing this work that Save Georgia’s Anchorages is doing on boaters’ behalf. See New Boating Laws.

We’ve been busy today here at SGA inventorying “all” the anchorages in Georgia and assessing the impact of HB 201. Previously we published map overlays on some of the more popular anchorages, but we wanted to be more comprehensive. The task is a difficult one as GA DNR continues to add / grow no-anchor zones seemingly on a daily basis. Two good examples are the area around Savannah Yacht Club as well as the anchorage off Cumberland Island.
In summary we inventoried 124 recognized and popular anchoring locations using detailed information obtained by Garmin, the world’s largest navigation charting service, Waterway Guide, and Cruisers Net. We will continue analysis in order to evaluate the impact of HB201 and Commissioner Mark Williams Administrative Order on anchoring in Georgia.

IMPACT ON KNOWN AND POPULAR ANCHORING LOCATIONS

22 (18%) anchoring locations were negatively impacted (area reduced or increased congestion due to closed nearby anchoring locations).

51 (41%) anchoring locations are essentially eliminated.

So a total of 73 (58%)of known and popular anchoring locations are impacted or eliminated out of a total of 124!!! All the state’s coastal water are (were) open to anchoring prior to HB201 and the establishment of setbacks or restricted areas, so the full impact on anchoring in areas not designated as “known and popular anchoring locations” is immeasurable.

A spreadsheet will be in the FILES section. The 2nd sheet has hyperlinks to these anchorages on the ActiveCaptain web viewer if you’d like to see where they are. Alternatively you can copy the Lat/Long into Google Maps.

We intend to review Waterway Guide and Cruisers Net to augment our data in the coming days.

Please contact Georgia legislators and DNR officials if you feel these regulations go too far.

This presentation is in the Susan Shipman Environmental Learning Center, 1 Conservation Way, Brunswick, GA 31520. It’s in the northeast corner of the parking lot at the DNR Coastal Regional Headquarters near the Sidney Lanier Bridge.

CRD to host presentation on coastal resiliency

BRUNSWICK, Ga. (Jan. 10, 2020) — The Coastal Resources Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources invites the public to attend a presentation on coastal resiliency at noon Jan. 28.

Analie Barnett, a landscape ecologist with The Nature Conservancy, will present on “Identifying Resilient Coastal Sites for Conservation in the South Atlantic” at the Susan Shipman Environmental Learning Center, One Conservation Way in Brunswick.

Coastal sites vary widely in their ability to accommodate rising seas, based on inherent natural features and the degree of human influence on key ecological processes. Scientists from The Nature Conservancy evaluated over 1,200 coastal sites in the South Atlantic for their capacity to sustain biodiversity and natural services under increasing sea levels.

Each site received a resilience “score” based on the likelihood that its coastal habitats can and will migrate to adjacent lowlands. With no action, the region could experience an estimated 77% loss of existing tidal habitats to severe inundation. However, there are many sites where tidal habitats could increase and expand through landward migration, reversing this trend.

With conservation and management, these resilient sites have the potential to offset almost 80% of the estimated tidal habitat loss, providing critical habitat for birds and other wildlife, and buffering communities from the effects of storms and floods. Conservation of these resilient sites is critical if we are to sustain nature’s diversity and benefits into the future.

This presentation will provide an overview of TNC’s approach to identifying resilient coastal sites in the South Atlantic, examine the results, and show different ways the results can be used, such as to prioritize land acquisition, identify areas for restoration, and find roads that may fragment future marsh areas. Results and potential applications will focus on Georgia’s coastal sites with some regional perspectives for context.

About the speaker

Analie Barnett is a Landscape Ecologist with The Nature Conservancy’s Eastern Conservation Science team and is based in Atlanta, Ga. She has been with the Conservancy for thirteen years. Barnett has expertise in geospatial analysis, multivariate analysis, landscape ecology, and conservation planning. She holds a Master of Environmental Management with a focus on conservation science from Duke University and received her B.A. from Austin College in Economics and Literature.

Barnett works on a variety of coastal, terrestrial, and freshwater projects in the Eastern U.S. that incorporate spatial and statistical analysis to inform conservation planning and natural resource management at large geographic scales. Recent projects include identification of coastal sites expected to be resilient to climate change in the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, U.S., multivariate analysis of long-term vegetation data to assess the effectiveness of longleaf pine management on military lands, ecosystem services assessment of bottomland hardwood reforestation scenarios in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, and spatial analysis to identify priority marine areas in the South Atlantic Bight. Her work has been published in peer-reviewed journals including BioScience, Ecological Applications and Plant Ecology.

More information

Anyone with questions can contact CRD’s communications specialist, Tyler Jones, at 912-262-3140 or tyler.jones@dnr.ga.gov.

Above photo by Ben Galland.

Our thanks to Kim Russo and Jack White for their efforts to protect the rights of boaters in Georgia. See Georgia Anchoring Regs.

Thanks for your patience, everyone, as we continue to gather information about the new rules on anchoring in Georgia.

Below is an op-ed written by one of our coalition partners, Jack White. Jack is a former Georgia state legislator and I think his explanation/summation of what has happened is spot on. Following Jack’s op-ed is a bit more of my take on the topic.

Kim

Betrayal of the public trust

Remember when you were in school and a few kids did something wrong and the whole class got punished? If so, then welcome to legislation—Georgia style! Georgia is now home to the most restrictive boater legislation in the nation. This past week the Coastal Resources Division (CRD) of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) posted the announcement of the implementation of HB201 on their website. You may recall this is the bill I warned Liberty and Bryan County residents about last summer. A hodgepodge of disjointed topics, the bill included anchoring permits, logs of pump-outs, fees and the establishment of anchorage areas. Did you catch that folks? Not just authorization to tell you where you CAN’T anchor but where you CAN anchor. The announcement this week (via Administrative Order from DNR Commissioner Mark Williams) graciously informs the public that “The Commissioner hereby ORDERS that anchorage areas for the purpose of overnight anchoring are established throughout all the estuarine areas the state…”. In other words, a right we have enjoyed for centuries in waters most boaters and boating organizations believe to be federally controlled (see the commerce clause of the US Constitution) has been granted to us by the DNR. This should be challenged in a court of law.

If you go onto the DNR website they will tell you “HB201 is a new law that mainly affects waste discharge from vessels with marine sanitation devices (MSDs) and overnight anchoring in coastal waters”. Folks, this is disingenuous at best. HB201 was NEVER about a concern over the cleanliness of Georgia’s waters. It was about getting rid of a couple of nuisance boats in the coastal Georgia area to make a couple of powerful people happy. It was their scenery that was getting polluted—not the water. To fix their problem, Representative Don Hogan (Brunswick, Ga) with the help of others crafted HB201 at the urging of DNR. Why? Because DNR needed a way to make these 2 complaints go away and establishing setbacks under the guise of clean water was deemed the answer. The hen has now come to roost in the form of this new DNR Administrative Order which outlines the following:

ONE. It restricts overnight anchoring within 1,000 feet (that’s over 3 football fields) of any structure, such as public and private docks, wharfs, bridges, piers and pilings, except in areas near marinas. This 1,000’ offset needlessly eliminates anchorages all over the state. It will affect numerous boaters many of which transit Georgia waters as part of the annual migration along the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) that brings in millions of dollars to Georgia businesses. Additionally, an unintended consequence of this ill-conceived legislation is that it gives private landowners jurisdiction over public waters free of charge with no need for a bottom lease from the state. Essentially waterfront owners now control thousands of acres of public water at no cost. I seriously question the legality of this action and challenge any attorney reading this to take action.

TWO. Commissioner Mark Williams and the DNR have created an animal known as Marina Zones, which wasn’t even in HB201. These will allow boaters to anchor as close as 300 feet to marinas or facilities that provide fuel, dinghy access, provisions, vessel maintenance or other services, regardless of whether other structures exist nearby. This of course begs the question, if we can anchor 300’ from a marina, where there are numerous comings and goings, why are we prohibited from anchoring 300’ from any other structure where there may be no or very limited activity? It makes zero sense but then it doesn’t have to as long as it makes the two waterfront owners happy. It would seem the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.

Many boating groups to include the National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA), Boat US, Seven Seas Cruising Association (SSCA), Marine Trawler Owners Association (MTOA), American Great Loopers Cruising Association (AGLCA), and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Association (AIWA) were never consulted before the legislation was passed. Most importantly, the general boating public was unaware of the bill until it had already passed. A public hearing occurred on June 17 in Brunswick where we voiced our concerns and were assured no rules would be implemented until they were vetted with the boating public. Afterwards, at a July 31st Stakeholders’ Meeting, which I and several boating representatives attended, we collectively recommended 150’ setbacks from marinas and private structures. Personnel at DNR were informed that a 1,000’ setback was far too large yet that has now been implemented.  So much for transparency and open dialogue with the public.

The General Assembly didn’t just take away the freedoms of Georgians, they also took away the freedoms of every American transiting our waters from other states. DNR never had any intention of engaging any of the end users–Georgia boaters and visiting boaters to the coastline of Georgia. Actions speak much louder than words.

So, what can we do? I invite the citizens of coastal Georgia to join me in writing and calling both the Governor’s office as well as the Commissioner of DNR.

Governor Brian Kemp
206 Washington Street
Suite 203, State Capitol
Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone Number: 404-656-2846
Toll Free: 1-800-436-7442
Contact via web form: https://gov.georgia.gov/contact-us/constituent-services

Commissioner Mark Williams
2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, SE
Suite 1252 – East Tower
Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone number: 404-656-3505
Contact via web form: https://gadnr.org/sendemail

Maps of restricted anchorage areas by county can be found here:
https://coastalgadnr.org/Liveaboards

//Signed//
Jack White
Boater, Liberty County resident & former Ga State Representative, House District 3

As Jack eloquently shared, stakeholders (including AGLCA) were invited by DNR to a meeting because they said they wanted our feedback as they crafted the implementation rules associated with HB201.  It was my understanding leaving that meeting, and from subsequent phone contact, that we’d be kept informed of progress and given the chance to preview the new rules before implementation to provide comment.  We were blindsided by the order two days before it took effect.  

Our coalition has been making calls and gathering information, and has not found a group that suggested 1,000-feet as a setback.  There seems to be no explanation as to how that distance was selected.  It appears that even marinas, who some think have the most to gain when boats cannot anchor overnight, appear to have suggested a setback far less than 1,000-feet.  And even Florida, where there are constant challenges to the right to anchor, has setbacks of only 150-feet.

There is some good news.  First, the wheels are in motion for a potential legislative change that we hope will undo the problems inherent in HB201.  We will provide more details on this as soon as we are able.  Second, groups much bigger than ours, with a lot more clout, are just as outraged as we are.  We hope to make more details about their efforts available soon as well.  

In the meantime, Jack’s suggestion of letter-writing to Commission Williams and Governor Kemp (see address information above) is our next course of action.  Please take the time to write.  Remember to be respectful, specific, and concise about how this administrative order will affect you.  For your convenience, the order is available here.  

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

-Kim

Kim Russo
Director
America’s Great Loop Cruisers’ Association